A young researcher's guide to a systematic review Series: Part04 - Types of articles: A guide for young researchers Key takeaways: A systematic review is a thorough and detailed review of existing literature on a particular topic, designed to address a specific question.
Tables Figures All scientific journals have author instructions. Study them carefully and follow them. Some journals may want you to submit without a title page. Some journals want the tables and figures as the last part of the manuscript.
Other journals want you to upload tables and figures as separate files. Some journals may want the acknowledgement in another place. All text should be written with 1. Most journals prefer a font size of The maximum allowed length of a manuscript varies depending on journal.
Item above should be headings in your manuscript. Item 3 Introduction is also a heading in some journals while in others the background text starts directly without a heading. Check in author instructions how long how many words your manuscript can be. A few journals have no word limit.
However, most journals have and for a literature review it would usually be somewhere between 2, words. The shorter the more likely it is read.
It is difficult and very time consuming to shorten a manuscript expressing yourself more succinct. However, if successful the reader will experience a well digested interesting text that reads more easily. For every sentence you need to ask yourself — is this sentence really necessary?
Can I refer to the original publication instead of describing all details? Once you have gone through all sentences you need to start over and ask for every word — is this word really necessary?
Have a look at some of the examples given in the table above. I also states who is corresponding author.Writing The Review Follow one of the high-quality guides such as PRISMA, Cochrane, or MOOSE.
The PRISMA item checklist is an excellent and easy to use set of guidelines for the writing process.
Of course you must include publications in less famous, non- refereed journals (and even “internal” reports) in your systematic review9 - you are the referee. Some papers are of high quality, but the authors are not yet familiar with the idea of writing a report for one of the well known English language journals.
RevMan (Cochrane Review Manager) - This is a professional level software application that can be used to prepare systematic reviews. It is recommended that you review the tutorial to see if the level of training needed to use the system is beyond your time commitment.
Writing a good discussion is probably the most challenging part of writing a good systematic literature review and this is often the part that ultimately decides if it is going to be published and read. Writing Systematic Reviews ** BMJ's How to Read a Paper series ** Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about) Trisha Greenhalgh.
The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling.